That the “Jews” are neither Israel nor Judah may be difficult for some to grasp. With this paper it will be shown that there is an appropriate usage for each of these three terms. Therefore, to use them synonymously (as if all three had the same identical meaning) exhibits gross ignorance on the part of the one speaking or writing with such an inference. It will be demonstrated that the house of Judah is not the house of Israel, nor is the house of Israel the house of Judah in a national sense! It was after the death of Solomon, under King Rehoboam, that the house of Israel and the house of Judah became two separate entities. Now one might properly call all twelve and/or thirteen tribes of Israel “Israelites”, but it would be improper to call any one or all of the ten northern tribes by the term “Judah”. It is also urgently imperative that we do not use the term Judah to mean “Jew”, nor the term “Jew” to mean Judah! (“ ” around Jew = disowning the term.)

180° DIFFERENCE BETWEEN JEW & JUDAH

To grasp the extreme contrast between “Jew” and Judah, one must comprehend some of the activity involved in the worship of Baal among both the northern kingdom of Israel as well as the southern kingdom of Judah. Baal is a term that designates several gods, but in particular the god Hadad, a popular fertility-god of Canaan. Another Baal-god of note is Dagon. There was also the Amorite Baal representing the god of rain and storm. Israel and Judah had been warned by Yahweh not to get involved in the gods of Canaan, but to drive all the Canaanites out of the land, and their gods with them, which they failed to do. Because most of the Bible dictionaries and commentaries use veiled language to describe Baal worship, many do not realize the danger it imposed to Israel and Judah. For instance, the Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible says this in vol. 1, p. 433 under “Baal”: “… It was attended by the appropriate response from the worshipers, culminating in grossly sensuous rites accompanying the sacred marriage, in which ritual prostitution of both sexes was a prominent feature.” Had this source described these rites as sexual orgies practiced with reckless abandon, the reader might absorb what is being said. To make a long story short, some of the women of Judah and Israel were becoming pregnant, giving birth to half-breed Canaanite children. Not only that, but by the same sexual rites, Canaanite women were also giving birth to half-breed Judahite children.

I will now borrow a passage from William Finck’s Broken Cisterns, #2: “In the first tract of this title, the sexual nature of certain ancient pagan cult religions was investigated, namely those of Baal (Bel or Belus) and Ashtaroth (Astartê or Aphroditê). Hopefully the realization was made – from the historians’ descriptions of these cults and from the utterances of the Hebrew prophets – that by following the so-called ‘religious’ cults of the alien peoples, it was necessary to have sexual relations with those peoples: for sex was at the core of those pagan cults!

“Further support for these assertions is found in The Interpreter’s One Volume Commentary On The Bible by Charles M. Laymon, on page 455, which makes the following comment concerning Hosea 4:10-19: ‘The Absurdity of Baal Worship. The whole harlotrous system of Baal fertility rites is utterly ineffectual as well as degrading. Its purpose is to provide fertility for human beings, flocks, and crops; but though the people play the harlot, i.e. carry on the sexual fertility acts at the shrine, they do not multiply … Despite woman’s usual secondary place in ancient society, there will be no double standard, for the men are responsible for the shame of cult prostitution. It is they who require their daughters to become cult prostitutes, lit. ‘holy women’ …’ And further on concerning Hosea 5:7: ‘In their Baal worship they give birth to alien children (vs. 7), the offspring of sexual cult rites …’ For Hosea 5:7 says: ‘They have dealt treacherously against Yahweh: for they have begotten strange children …’” It is from these half-breed Judahite-Canaanites whence cometh the “Jews” referred to at Jeremiah 24:2 as “naughty figs”. Although Laymon was commenting on Hosea which concerned the northern Kingdom of Israel, the southern Kingdom of Judah did likewise.

Canaanite Goddess of Fertility

The passage above from The Interpreter’s One Volume Commentary On The Bible was first brought to my attention by a prisoner by the name of David Putterlik who found it in his prison’s library. It just so happened that I had this same book. I copied the page he cited and sent it to Finck, and in turn Finck used it in his Broken Cisterns, #2 brochure. It all boils down to this: A half-breed Canaanite-Judahite is a bad-fig-jew, while a good-fig-Judahite is one who is racially pure!

Once one discovers the difference between true Judah and the jews (hereinafter not capitalized) one is oriented in the proper direction, but there is much more of the story to take into account. That there were half-breed Canaanite-Judahites at the time of Jeremiah, he makes quite clear at 2:21: “Yet I had planted thee [Judah] a noble [unmixed] vine, wholly a right [racially pure] seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate [race-mixed] plant of a strange [alien] vine unto me?” I amplified this verse as some might erroneously believe it is speaking of horticulture, which it is not! That it is speaking of people can be verified with the next verse 22: “For though thou wash thee with nitre, and take thee much soap, yet thine [hybrid] iniquity is marked before me, saith Yahweh singular-elohim.” It would be ridiculous to wash one’s crops or garden with nitre (strong lye) and soap. Therefore the prophet is describing the physical mark (appearance) of a half-bred or race-mixed person! It is recorded that Yahweh placed a “mark” on Cain at Gen. 4:15. Was it the “mark” of a half-breed? If it wasn’t, then Cain had two marks. Every half-breed (bastard-mamzer) has a mark that simply can’t be washed away no matter how much lye and soap they may use! The good-fig-Judahites – being racially pure – are free of any such mark, while the bad-fig-jews are marked forever throughout all their generations, for mamzers can only breed more mamzers! The genetics of a mamzer simply can’t be undone, thus are unforgivable without pardon!

Jer. 2:21 may be compared to the language of Deut. 32:32, where the enemies of Yahweh are discussed: “For their vine [family line] is of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah: their grapes [DNA characteristics] are grapes of gall, their clusters [offspring] are bitter …” Scripture is clear concerning the depraved condition of these Canaanite peoples, whom were all to be destroyed!

Yahweh spoke through Jeremiah of both good-figs as well as bad-figs. Let’s now see what is recorded about these good and bad figs at Jer. 24:2: “One basket had very good figs, even like the figs that are first ripe: and the other basket had very naughty figs, which could not be eaten, they were so bad.” It should be noted here and at verse 8, the term “eaten” is used. It is the same Hebrew idiom which was used for Eve “… thou shalt not eat …”, meaning not to have sexual intercourse with. It is the same “eateth” as that of Prov. 30:20: “Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.” This is not speaking of wiping the mouth on the woman’s face but wiping her vagina! Thus, Yahweh, through Jeremiah, was saying that the racially mixed bad-fig-jews were so genetically rotten, one could not marry with them and have racially pure children by them! What else did you think Jeremiah was talking about? It’s as ridiculous as accusing Eve of eating from a wooden tree!

GOOD-FIG-JUDAHITES NOT IN PALESTINE TODAY!

To comprehend this fact, we must go to Jer. 1:10 and examine Jeremiah’s assigned commission by Yahweh: “See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.” We will notice that Jeremiah’s Yahweh-given commission consists of six parts: (1) to root out, (2) to pull down, (3) to destroy, (4) to throw down, (5) to build, and (6) to plant. When “nations” are specified, being in the plural, some may come to the erroneous conclusion that Jeremiah was to employ all of these six directives to all of the nations around him, but this is not so. Rather, these six charges were to affect Judah in particular and Israel in a secondary manner. Other non-Israel nations only enter into prophecy when they were – had been – or were going to be – in contact with the twelve tribes.

One must understand that by the time of Jeremiah’s commission, the ten tribes of the northern kingdom of Israel, and the greater part of the southern kingdom of Judah, were already in Assyrian captivity. Yahweh assigned Jeremiah the task to root out, pull down, destroy, and throw down the remnant of the remaining nation of Judah, doomed to extinction in 70 A.D., never, ever to be reestablished. Jeremiah’s commission to build and to plant is completely ignored by nominal churchianity. For some reason, most likely because of other prophecies concerning the blindness of cast-off Israel, Yahweh chose not to have Jeremiah include the building and planting in his history, and the doctors of divinity today claim he failed to complete his mission and died in Egypt. Poor old God, can’t do anything right!

Another aspect that should be considered is the fact that the greater part of the good-fig-Judahites that went into the Babylonian captivity never returned, and what few did return to Jerusalem, over a period from 436 B.C. till 70 A.D., by-and-large absorbed much Canaanite and Edomite blood until Judaea became better than 98% a bad-fig-nation. That is why Christ Himself cursed the fig tree which represented the genetically corrupted nation that Judaea had become. It was a gradual process, taking about 500 years to transpire.

Let’s now see what Jeremiah prophesied, found at 24:5-7, for the good-fig-Judahites, whom by-and-large never returned to Jerusalem: 5 Thus saith Yahweh, the singular-elohim of Israel; Like these good figs, so will I acknowledge them that are carried away captive of Judah, whom I have sent out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for their good. 6 For I will set mine eyes upon them for good, and I will bring them again to this land: and I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7 And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am Yahweh: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart.”

One should not become confused with the prophetic language of this passage where it says: “… I will bring them again to this land …” Indeed, a portion of the good-fig-Judahites who went into the Babylonian captivity did return to Jerusalem, but this passage also states: “… I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up …” which does not fit the nation of Judah, for, indeed, that nation was pulled down by the Romans in 70 A.D., which is also prophesied never to be restored. Actually, a few believing good-fig-Judahites were given leave by the Romans before the siege, whereupon they fled to Pella, fulfilling Yahshua’s directive at Matt. 24:16-18. It also fulfilled Matt. 21:43, where Yahshua said to the bad-fig-jews: “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.” And once Yahweh takes something away from an undeserving party and gives it to a deserving party, He doesn’t return it to the undeserving party again!

There is another passage at Jeremiah 24:8-9 for which we must separate the good and bad figs: 8 And as the evil figs, which cannot be eaten, they are so evil; surely thus saith Yahweh, So will I give Zedekiah the king of Judah, and his princes, and the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land, and them that dwell in the land of Egypt: 9 And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them.” Here are two different entities, (1) “…Zedekiah the king of Judah, and his princes …”, and (2) “… the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land …”. Even though Zedekiah and his princes were not following Yahweh’s directives through Jeremiah, yet genetically they were good-fig-Judahites as the kings and princes of Judah were of royal blood. Had they not been of the pure bloodline of David of the tribe of Judah, they would have been rejected as kings and princes. Some read this verse surmising that Zedekiah and his princes were bad-fig-jews. It was rather “… the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land …” that were the bad-fig-jews! I bring this matter forward as there are a few in Israel Identity who insist that Zedekiah and his princes were bad-fig-jews, thus rejecting Zedekiah’s daughters as heirs to the throne whom Jeremiah planted in Ireland (recorded only in Irish records).

Thus, it is not the good-fig Judahites who are in Palestine today, but the bad-fig-jews. But where did these good-fig-Judahites go? A clue to that question is found at Ezek. 17:22-24: 22 Thus saith Yahweh singular-elohim; I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set it; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will plant it upon an high mountain and eminent: 23 In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it: and it shall bring forth boughs, and bear fruit, and be a goodly cedar: and under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell. 24 And all the trees of the field shall know that I Yahweh have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I Yahweh have spoken and have done it.” That Ezekiel is speaking of the king of Babylon bringing Jerusalem and Judaea into subjection can be verified at verse 12. If this passage seems difficult to understand, it is only because it is veiled in prophetic allegory. Once key symbols are identified, the meanings become quite clear. The “highest branch of the high cedar” represents the line of David from the Pharez branch of Judah ruling over Judah in the person of Zedekiah at the time of Jeremiah. Where it says: “I will crop off from the top of his young twigs”, it is an allegory for Zedekiah’s daughters becoming heirs to the throne after all of Zedekiah’s sons were slain by Nebuchadnezzar, in particular Tea Tephi. The statement “… will plant it upon an high mountain and eminent” represents transferring the ruling House of David from Judaea, in the person of Tea Tephi, to Britain; Ireland in particular. Again where it states, “In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it: and it shall bring forth boughs, and bear fruit”, it is speaking of the Davidic ruler-ship being transferred to Britain from Judaea, which surely fits as Christ Himself cursed that remnant nation saying “Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever”, Matt. 21:19. Hence, the good-fig-Judahites were prophesied to bear much fruit, while the cursed bad-fig-jews were to bear none, showing the 180° difference in character between the two.

Jer. 24:9 is later echoed by Yahshua at Luke 21:24: “And they [the disbelieving, bad-fig-jews] shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations …”, and this shows the bad figs were dispersed upon the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 A.D.

BAD-FIG-JEWS ARE NOT ISRAELITES!

Since the bad-fig-jews ARE NOT good-fig-Judahites, neither are they Israelites! Therefore, to call the Mideast sand-box bad-fig-jews of today “Israel” certainly is a misnomer, and shows an abysmal ignorance on the part of anyone who does so! “Abysmal” means beyond comprehension! Yahshua Christ Himself made it so indisputably clear that the bad-fig-jews were in no way Israelites that the question shouldn’t even be open for discussion. It may come as a surprise to many, but those calling themselves “jews” are not Israelites. I know this is the message echoed throughout the Church-world and among the bad-fig-jews themselves, but it simply is not true. And, wishful thinking is not going to make it so. Not one single bad-fig-jew on the face of the world is an Israelite. Therefore, the biggest lie in the world is: “the jews are God’s chosen people.” The second biggest lie is: “Jesus was a ‘jew’.” Anyone making these statements is a liar, or is repeating another person’s falsehood. Yahshua told the “jews”, (John 10:25-29): 25 Yahshua answered them, I told you [bad-fig-jews], and ye [bad-fig- jews] believed not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me. 26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my [Israel] sheep, as I said unto you. 27 My [Israel] sheep hear my voice, and I know [my Israel sheep], and [my Israel sheep] follow me: 28 And I give unto [my Israel sheep] eternal life; and [my Israel sheep] shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck [my Israel sheep] out of my hand. 29 My Father, which gave [my Israel sheep to] me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck [my Israel sheep] out of my Father’s hand.”

The Interpreter’s Bible, volume 8, page 632, states in reference to this passage: “In that case evidently you have no manner of kinship with me.” Again, Yahshua told the bad-fig-jews, John 8:47: “He that is of Yahweh heareth Yahweh’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of Yahweh.” Yahshua further dissociated Himself from the bad-fig-jews by saying to them, John 8:23: “… Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.” At Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, Yahshua said of the bad-fig-jews pretending to be Judah: “… I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judahites [of the tribe of Judah], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” One should take note from this verse that it is “blasphemy” for a bad-fig-jew to claim he is an Israelite of the tribe of Judah! Yet nominal churchianity continually parrots that same blasphemous claim! Question: Can you imagine anything more blasphemous than a half-breed Canaanite claiming to be a relative of Yahshua Christ? From this it should be apparent that the bad-fig-jews will not be able to enter the gate of the city mentioned at Revelation 21:12 which is inscribed “Judah”. The Ronald Knox paraphrase style of translation renders Rev. 3:9 in part: “… (though they are no[t] true Jews [sic Judahites]: they are rather the chosen people of Satan)”.

Throughout the Old and New Testaments, all of the twelve tribes of the true Israelites are referred to as “sheep”. The passages doing so are so numerous that all of them cannot be cited here. Therefore, it is simply ridiculous to call the Canaanite variety of bad-fig-jews sheep, while it is very appropriate to call good-fig-Judahites sheep. When it says at Isaiah 53:6, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and Yahweh hath laid on him the iniquity of us all”, it has absolutely nothing to do with the bad-fig-jews. Christ even spoke in parables in order to prevent the conversion of the bad-fig-jews (i.e. jews-for-Jesus). He didn’t want them then, and He doesn’t want them now! Actually, the bad-fig-jews are wolves rather than sheep, and should be placed into the wolf-people category (and wolves love to kill and eat sheep). They (the wolves), by false witness were even responsible for the brutal murder of “the Lamb of God”, John 1:29; Rev 13:8. Hence, when a bad-fig-jew pretends to be an Israelite, he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing! When are we ever going to see through the wolf-peoples’ disguise? When are we ever going to differentiate between a good-fig-Judahite and a bad-fig-jew? Such a distinction is a matter of life verses death. To continue our status quo will only bring more of the enemy’s agenda for exterminating the White race, who just happen to be true Israel.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here